Protocol for Systematic Comparison of Chatbot Responses to Contested Facts🌐ترجمة

العرض

كتبه الفريق. ليس عرض استثمار وليس نصيحة.

المشكلة

حللت فريق بحثي كيفية تأطير الدردشة الآلية الكبرى للقضايا الجيوسياسية الحساسة. يقترح هذا المشروع بروتوكولًا لمقارنة منهجية لمخرجات الدردشة الآلية حول الحقائق المتنازع عليها

ما الذي يبنونه

A paper-based or spreadsheet checklist with 10-20 pre-selected sensitive questions, a template for recording chatbot responses, and a summary table. Operated by a small team (2-3 people) over one week, using publicly accessible chatbots. No personal data collected; all responses anonymized. Unvalidated hypothesis; full brief: /blog/when-chatbots-become-answer-engines-ai-geopoliti-2026-11-03 Source: رابط

🌐ترجمة

لمن هو

Researchers, educators, journalists, and civil society groups concerned with information accuracy and narrative framing in AI chatbot outputs, especially in regions with contested histories.

🌐ترجمة

لماذا يهمّ

Whether a standardized protocol enables more transparent, reproducible, and actionable comparison of chatbot outputs than ad hoc or anecdotal approaches. Test if the protocol reveals systematic framing differences. Proposed validation: Proposed pilot target: 10 questions, 3 chatbots, 2 reviewers, 1 week. Baseline: manual comparison without protocol. Success: at least 80% agreement between reviewers on categorization of framing and accuracy. Measured by inter-rater reliability and completeness of summa

🌐ترجمة