Protocol for Systematic Comparison of Chatbot Responses to Contested Facts🌐Traducir

Pitch

Escrito por el equipo. No es una oferta de inversión ni un consejo.

Problema

Un equipo de investigación analizó cómo los principales chatbots de IA enmarcan cuestiones geopolíticas sensibles. Este proyecto propone un protocolo para comparar sistemáticamente las salidas de los chatbots sobre hechos en disputa

Lo que están construyendo

A paper-based or spreadsheet checklist with 10-20 pre-selected sensitive questions, a template for recording chatbot responses, and a summary table. Operated by a small team (2-3 people) over one week, using publicly accessible chatbots. No personal data collected; all responses anonymized. Unvalidated hypothesis; full brief: /blog/when-chatbots-become-answer-engines-ai-geopoliti-2026-11-03 Source: Enlace

🌐Traducir

Para quién es

Researchers, educators, journalists, and civil society groups concerned with information accuracy and narrative framing in AI chatbot outputs, especially in regions with contested histories.

🌐Traducir

Por qué importa

Whether a standardized protocol enables more transparent, reproducible, and actionable comparison of chatbot outputs than ad hoc or anecdotal approaches. Test if the protocol reveals systematic framing differences. Proposed validation: Proposed pilot target: 10 questions, 3 chatbots, 2 reviewers, 1 week. Baseline: manual comparison without protocol. Success: at least 80% agreement between reviewers on categorization of framing and accuracy. Measured by inter-rater reliability and completeness of summa

🌐Traducir